The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Christian Virtues in Organizational Leadership: An Analysis of Nonprofit Leaders
The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence and Christian Virtues in Organizational Leadership: An Analysis of Nonprofit Leaders
Rupert Alexander Hayles, Jr. | 2021
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of a correlational linkage between emotional intelligence (EI) and virtue specifically regarding leadership development. The research study was based on foundational work by Culham and Bai (2011) and Palser (2005). While Palser focused on EI correlative effect and burnout, which is an emotional outcome, Culham and Bai (2011) focused on a conceptual model emphasizing linkages between EI and virtue based on ethics. These seminal research studies formed the foundation of this study to expand and provide quantitative grounded research on the linkage between EI and virtue through morality and ethics. This study included an investigation into the linkage between virtue espoused within a spiritual context and the increase in EI as a basis of organizational and leadership expansion. The overarching direction of the study was to address whether there is a relationship between EI and virtue, specifically Christian virtues. The researcher further assessed whether people with high virtue attributes and EI subscale attributes are more likely to demonstrate effective leadership, and whether people with low virtue attributes and EI subscale attributes are less likely to demonstrate effective leadership. The researcher addressed the various components and crystalized a belief, yet unproven, that factors within EI impact virtue and vice versa. The results of this study revealed a statistically significant relationship between EI and virtue. Relationship with God—consisting of love, joy, and peace—was the strongest predictor of EI (self-perception, self-expression, interpersonal, and stress management), with the exception of decision-making. This study serves as a foundation with significant implications for further research in identifying other relational factors that could espouse causality and that are descriptive, predictive, or explanatory in relation to leaders’ growth.