Toxic Leadership, Toxic Followership, and the Role of Social Identity in Toxic Followership Behavior
Toxic Leadership, Toxic Followership, and the Role of Social Identity in Toxic Followership Behavior
Danica Myers | 2021
Abstract
Knowing how followers define themselves and the complex ways in which these self-definitions are shaped by experiences between leaders and followers can bring insights into follower behavior (Baker, 2007). This bounded case study provides insight into the drivers of followership behavior and develops greater insight into the role of followers in the toxic leadership process through the frameworks of (a) followership, (b) the toxic triangle, (c) social identity, and (d) follower compliance.
To gain insight into toxic follower behavior, the following research questions guided this study: (a) Why do followers comply with perceived toxic leadership directives? (b) How does perceived self-concept external source of motivation motivate followers to comply with perceived toxic leadership directives? and (c) How does social identification influence follower’s compliance with perceived toxic leadership directives? The literature review contributed to developing open-ended questions for in-depth interviews. Data analysis included in vivo coding and pattern coding. The findings revealed social identity and self-concept external motivation played a role in influencing followers’ compliance to toxic leadership. Self-concept external motivation influenced followers’ compliance through a desire
for affirmation from leaders and other group members, while social identity influenced followers’ compliance through organizational identity and shared cultural identities. Overall, this study revealed multiple factors influence individuals to operate as toxic followers.