About

Regent University School of Law opened its doors in 1986. Today, the school offers a Juris Doctor (JD) in traditional, two-year accelerated and part-time formats, an online LL.M. in Human Rights and LL.M. in American Legal Studies, and an M.A. in Law. Additionally, thousands of Regent Law alumni practice law across the United States and in more than 20 countries. These capable men and women are distinguishing themselves as judges and judicial clerks, partners and associates in law firms, mayors and legislators, and in positions with government agencies and public interest organizations.

With a proven record of producing practice-ready, purpose-driven graduates who impact the world, Regent Law offers a unique combination of:

  • A Christ-centered mission,
  • A first-rate faculty ranked in the top 10 of all American law schools for three consecutive years by The Princeton Review, alongside schools such as Chicago, Virginia, Stanford, Duke, and Washington & Lee,
  • An exceptional academic program ranking 5th in the nation for its moot court program and in the top 25 percent of all law schools for obtaining judicial clerkships, and
  • High levels of student satisfaction.

For JD students, we offer the following programs and centers:

Integrated Lawyer Training

Honors Program

Academic Success Program

International Study Opportunities 

All of these elements not only equip our students to earn top honors in regional, national and international competitions, but prepare our graduates to consistently do well on the bar exam.

Regent Law’s Bar Pass Rates (2011-2015).

  • 96 percent of our graduates who had an LSAT score above 160 passed the bar exam on their first attempt.
  • 90 percent of our graduates who had an LSAT score above 155 passed the bar exam on their first attempt.
  • 83 percent of our graduates who had an LSAT score above 150 passed the bar exam on their first attempt.

Message from the Dean

Dean Michael V. Hernandez, Regent University School of Law, Virginia Beach.
Dean Michael V. Hernandez

You are bright, motivated, and interested in law, and you want to pursue an education that will prepare you to be an attorney with a passion for justice who will make a lasting impact on the world. So, why Regent Law?

Of the more than 200 fully accredited law schools in the United States, Regent Law offers a unique combination of a Christ-centered mission, a first-rate faculty and academic program, and high levels of student satisfaction.

Mission—Old and New, National and Global: Our mission is to place our students and graduates strategically around the world. Grounded in the best of the old and the new, we lay a foundation of first principles of law, the Western Legal and Common Law traditions, and American Constitutionalism, while equipping students with the contemporary knowledge base and skills necessary to thrive in any law-related discipline.

Scholars: Regent Law faculty members are experienced and highly credentialed with law degrees from schools such as Harvard, Chicago, Virginia, Duke, Georgetown, and, of course, Regent. Our distinguished faculty includes former United States Attorney General John Ashcroft and the Chief Counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice, Dr. Jay Sekulow. Other faculty members have taught at, among other schools, Harvard Law and William & Mary Law. While our faculty have extensive practice experience and have published several leading law treatises, what truly sets them apart is their commitment, as Christian legal scholars, to integrate faith thoroughly in and outside the classroom and mentor the next generation of lawyers.

Academic Quality: Regent Law’s comprehensive and skills-intensive curriculum prepares students to enter the law field of their choice. A recent study* shows that Regent Law has done the best job of any law school in Virginia at increasing its graduates’ likelihood of success on the Virginia bar exam. Additionally, Regent Law was named to the list of 2015 Best Law Schools for Bar Exam Prep and 2015 Best Law Schools for Practical Training by the National Jurist.

Our academic centers reflect the belief that education must be holistic and extends beyond the classroom.

  • The Center for Ethical Formation, which is at the forefront of the movement to train ethical attorneys, paired 114 students in 2014-15 with judge or attorney mentors.
  • The Center for Advocacy reflects our commitment to excellent, practical skills training, and the results are evident—our Moot Court program was ranked 5th in the nation in 2015-16.
  • The Center for Global Justice has placed more than 100 interns in the past five years with public interest law firms, government agencies, and non-profit legal organizations worldwide.

Furthermore, Regent Law’s innovative and successful Honors Program has attracted highly credentialed applicants. The members of the first Honors Program graduating class had a 92.3% first time bar passage rate, with more than a quarter securing a judicial clerkship.

Student Satisfaction: Our talented student body is vibrant, motivated, welcoming, and highly satisfied with their Regent Law experience. Based on a survey of all American law students, the Princeton Review has ranked our faculty in the top 10 in the country for three consecutive years. Additionally, the most recent national Law School Survey of Student Engagement revealed that, for all variables surveyed, our students expressed satisfaction consistently significantly above—and often more than double—the national average.

Impactful Alumni: Regent Law includes an extensive network of accomplished alumni in the legal profession around the world, including judges, legislators, in-house counsel of major corporations, a Harvard Law lecturer, a William & Mary Law faculty member, the executive director of the American Center for Law & Justice, a senior adviser to a 2016 Presidential Campaign, an associate general counsel for the University of Virginia, and numerous JAG Officers. Our graduates are at the center of prominent litigation, including arguing successfully before the United States Supreme Court. Also, Regent Law recently ranked in the top 25% of law schools for graduates who obtained judicial clerkships.

I invite you to learn more about the Regent Law difference and contact us if you have any questions. If you are ready to be challenged, stretched, equipped, and sent out to impact the world, we welcome you to become a lifelong member of the Regent Law team.

 

Michael V. Hernandez, J.D.
Dean and Professor

 

* The National Jurist ranked Regent Law as one of the top 17% of law schools with graduates whose bar pass rates out-performed their incoming LSAT scores. PreLaw Magazine, NAT’L JURIST, Spr. 2015, Vol. 8, No. 4 at 40, 41.

Philosophy & Mission

Purpose Driven, Practice Ready

“He has shown you, O mortal, what is good. And what does the LORD require of you? To act justly and to love mercy and to walk humbly with your God.” Micah 6:8 (NIV)

At Regent University School of Law, academic excellence, coupled with an emphasis on spiritual integrity, educates a different kind of lawyer, uniquely prepared to practice law. Here you will not only be trained to practice law, but you will be well-equipped to enter the legal profession as a fully integrated lawyer with a thorough knowledge of the law, the practice skills to put that knowledge to use, and the character necessary to succeed with integrity.

Our commitment to faith-law integration is woven into our curriculum, as our faculty, dedicated to Christ’s call both personally and professionally, provide a caring and nurturing environment in which students gain an understanding of the foundations of law and learn to develop the ethical and moral code required for the recognition and resolution of ethical dilemmas. Additionally, students are encouraged to explore the call of God on their lives, the gifts God has given them and discover how this translates into the practice of law.

It is through our rigorous legal education in the context of a supportive Christian community, that our students are equipped to be purpose driven, practice ready graduates with the confidence and spiritual integrity to seek justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God as Christian leaders who will change the world.

 

Mission Statement

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a biblical perspective and global context, equipping Christian leaders to change the world. These values permeate the law school. Our mission is to provide an excellent legal education from a Christian perspective, to nurture and encourage our students toward spiritual maturity, and to engage the world through Christian legal thought and practice.

The law school mission includes:

  • Education and training of students to become excellent lawyers.
  • Nurturing and encouragement of students to become mature Christians who are empowered with the Holy Spirit and display the fruits of the Holy Spirit in their personal and professional lives while impacting the world.
  • The grounding of students in the biblical foundations of law, legal institutions, and processes of conflict resolution; the recognition of questions of righteousness in the operation of law; and the pursuit of true justice through professional legal service.
  • Community of other law students, practicing lawyers, judges, legislators, government officials, educators, and others to recognize and seek the biblical foundations of law, legal institutions, and the processes of conflict resolution; to recognize questions of righteousness in the operation of the law; and to pursue true justice through professional legal service.

FAQ

Admissions FAQ

For the entering 2015 class:

Applications: 526
Entering Class Size: 85

GPA
25th Percentile: 3.00
50th Percentile: 3.29
75th Percentile: 3.55

LSAT
25th Percentile: 149
50th Percentile: 152
75th Percentile: 154

DEMOGRAPHICS
Minority Enrollment: 27%
Female Enrollment: 54%
Average Age: 49% of students are 25-34
Residency: 42%
No. of States Represented: 22
No. of Countries Represented: 5 (Canada, Romania, Russia, South Korea & the U.S.)
No. of Academic Institutions Represented: 76

The first-year academic attrition average for 2014-15 is 16%.

Read about the career outcomes of our graduates and view a list of employers who have hired our graduates.

Our graduates serve in the nation’s top 100 law firms, in public service and in local, state, and national government positions.

Over the last five years (2011-2015):

  • 96 percent of our graduates who had an LSAT score above 160 passed the bar exam on their first attempt.
  • 90 percent of our graduates who had an LSAT score above 155 passed the bar exam on their first attempt.
  • 83 percent of our graduates who had an LSAT score above 150 passed the bar exam on their first attempt.

The law school has no mandatory curve in terms of grade distribution, but it has adopted a B/B-norm (2.7-2.9) for all first-year courses and a B/B+ norm (2.9-3.1) for most upper-level courses. View our grading policy.

Taking the LSAT

Members of the admissions committee believe that the best time to take the LSAT is in the fall or in December. By sitting for either of these two early LSAT administrations, an applicant will be assured that his or her admission file will be in the first round of files reviewed by the committee. In turn, these early test takers can expect to receive a decision from the committee by early February if all other required documentation has been received.

Applicants who take the October, December, or February LSAT can be assured of receiving full consideration for both admission and scholarship assistance. Applicants who sit for the June LSAT may be admitted if there are remaining seats in the class when the June scores become available. Applicants to the Two-year Accelerated program are encouraged to take the October or December LSAT.

The committee considers all scores when an applicant has taken the LSAT more than once, though the highest score is heavily weighted.

Applying to Regent Law

The admissions committee includes several members of the faculty, an associate dean, and the director of admissions. Typically, the Admissions Office begins reviewing applications for fall admission in late December. The committee admits on a “rolling” basis. Once the committee convenes, applicants should receive a letter of decision within approximately three weeks from the time the file is complete.

The admissions committee places significant importance on the Personal Statement section of the application. Applicants are expected to submit a well-reasoned personal statement or essay, evidencing the applicant’s writing, grammar, and thinking skills in 500-1000 words. The essay may assist the admissions committee to understand additional skills, abilities, and life experiences, which the applicant would bring to the incoming class. The essay may also reveal a sense of the candidate’s motivation for studying law at Regent University. This motivation (or calling) is a very important issue for members of the admissions committee.

Interviews are not required, although the admissions committee may contact an applicant as part of the committee’s decision-making process. If an interview is requested by the committee, it is likely that the interview can be accomplished by telephone.

Our Priority application date is February 1, though applications are accepted between September 1 and June 1 or until the class is filled. International applicants and applicants to the Two-year Accelerated Program are encouraged to apply by January 15. For seating availability information, please contact the Office of Admissions at 757.352.4584 or lawschool@regent.edu.

Applicants are welcome to submit addenda with their applications including grade or LSAT-explanation statements addressing situations in which the applicant has overcome significant cultural, economic, familial, or other challenges.

Getting Accepted to Regent Law

The admissions committee evaluates the following:

  • overall GPA and grade trends,
  • the rigor of courses completed,
  • the competitiveness of the institution attended,
  • comments from faculty recommenders or evaluators as they relate to the applicant’s performance,
  • future potential and extenuating circumstances that may have affected the applicant’s college performance at the graduate level, in addition to the undergraduate record.

The Committee carefully weighs each applicant’s LSAT score in light of the many other parts of the applicant’s admissions file in conjunction with the desired overall profile for the incoming class. The committee relies heavily upon the highest score when an applicant has taken the LSAT more than once, but all scores will be reviewed. Applications from prospective students with LSAT scores of 150 and above and undergraduate GPAs of 3.0 and above are especially encouraged, as the law school has seen that such students are likely to succeed in law school and also likely to pass the bar exam on their first attempt.

Applicants accepted to the law program are expected to deposit and register for classes the year in which they are accepted to the law school. On a case by case basis, a student may be granted a one-year deferment, prior to Orientation, generally due to a medical, financial, military, or unique family circumstance.

Accepted students who need to request deferment must submit a written request outlining the reasons for the deferment request before June 1.

A joint degree student who begins his/her studies at Regent in the other school is automatically granted a one-year deferment to the law school. Students granted deferment must submit an abbreviated admissions application update, including the character and fitness statement as formal reapplication. This will be required of the student prior to matriculation the next year to ensure that no substantive changes have occurred. Joint degree students must meet “Satisfactory Academic Progress” at the end of the spring term in order to matriculate into the law school.

Individuals not granted deferment may reapply as a new applicant at a later time. Since the law school financial aid budget is established yearly, students who have been granted deferment must reapply for financial aid for the year in which they plan to matriculate. Scholarships and/or awards granted previously by the law school may not necessarily apply. Deferred applicants are encouraged to reapply for financial aid concurrent with the abbreviated admissions application update.

A spirit of cooperation and support is evident in the students and faculty. Because of the unique mission of Regent Law, students pray for, encourage, and support one another. Professors genuinely care for their students, both professionally and personally. This positive environment is reflected in student satisfaction and The Princeton Review top 10 recognition of Regent’s “Quality of Student Life.”

The Career Services strategy is designed to meet the needs of law students in each year of study. The program includes individualized counseling, self-assessment, a general investigation of career opportunities and specific career search techniques, along with assistance in professional development materials. A job bulletin board announces openings for internships, clerkships, associate positions, and other law-related opportunities. It also promotes numerous judicial clerkships available nationwide. View Career Service outcomes.

We encourage all prospective students to schedule a visit to our campus. We believe that a visit to the Regent community will reveal significant information about the mission of the school and your potential place within our community. The invitation to visit Regent is a standing one and can be geared toward individual schedules or one of our informative admissions events.

All students are invited to participate in the academic support services provided by the law school under the direction of Professor and Director of Academic Success Natt Gantt and Associate Professor of Law and Associate Director Gloria Whittico. As a part of the application process, the admissions committee identifies selected students to participate in the Academic Success Program if those students possess a strong likelihood of success in law school but would especially benefit from an extended orientation due to their LSAT score, undergraduate GPA, or other factors, such as their undergraduate major or the length of time since they have been enrolled in an academic program. The Summer Program is not a performance-based or trial admissions program. All participants are expected to continue with their studies in the fall semester.

Cost

(Cost of attendance = tuition + fees + estimated living expenses.)
The cost will vary from student to student. Tuition and fees are listed on individual program pages. Learn how to calculate your cost of attendance.

Regent is a private school, so tuition is the same for Virginia and non-Virginia residents.

For 2015 graduates: Approximately $80,529

Funding Sources

There are scholarship and grants available.  Awards are primarily merit-based.  Generally, law school awards are automatically assessed based upon the entirety of the admissions file.  University endowments require a scholarship application and the deadline for submitting the applications and supporting documents is March 1 each year.

Scholarships are available for first-year students (1Ls) and are based upon the entirety of the accepted student’s admissions file to include undergraduate GPA, LSAT, personal statement, letters of recommendation, etc.

In order to qualify for federal loans students must not have defaulted on a student loan in the past (Stafford Loan eligibility) and must not have adverse credit history (Grad-PLUS loan eligibility).  Students should check their credit reports (www.annualcreditreport.com) to ensure their reports do not reflect adverse credit.

Additional Expenses

Federal financial aid allows for loan assistance for room, board, fees, books, and other expenses.  However, scholarships and grants cannot exceed the cost of tuition.

A full tuition scholarship only includes the cost of tuition.  Assistance for room, board, fees, and other expenses is available through federal loans.

$693/mo. for single student on-campus housing (assumes a roommate). Our housing team also provides an off-campus referral service for families and singles. regent.edu/housing

Eligibility

95 percent of students received scholarships and grants 2015-16.

Academic merit scholarships begin at LSAT of 156 and UGPA of 3.0.but other scholarships and grants may be available for leadership, public service, and other factors.

Military Benefits

Yes. Regent Law offers a Yellow Ribbon $8,000 matching award.

Yes. Learn more about military benefits, including our military discount.

Credit

Run a credit report on yourself to assure you do not have adverse credit.  Do it early enough to correct any matters so that you qualify for loans (www.annualcreditreport.com).

Awards & Honors

Regent University School of Law’s Center for Advocacy trains students in the legal skills of negotiation, trial advocacy, and appellate advocacy, developing competition teams that are among the top teams in the nation. To date, these Regent teams have won more than 90 national and regional championships, best brief, and best oralist awards.

COMPETITION AWARD HIGHLIGHTS

At the close of the 2015-2016 Moot Court competition season, Regent University School of Law ranked fifth in the nation for Best Moot Court Program by the annual report of the University of Houston Law. Law schools that rank within the top 16 are invited to Houston in January 2017 to participate in the national championship. Regent ranked above schools such as the University of Virginia, Baylor University Law School, Colombia University Law School, and Duke University Law School to qualify for the competition.

2016 CHARLESTON MOOT COURT COMPETITION:
1ST PLACE | BEST ORALIST

Regent Law team members Glenn Reynolds ’16, Courtney Marasigan ’17, and Alexandra McPhee ’17 – coached by LAW assistant professor Tessa Dysart – won the Charleston Moot Court Competition. Reynolds earned the title “best oralist” for the final round of the competition.

2016 ROBERT R. MERHIGE, JR. NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL NEGOTIATION COMPETITION:
2ND PLACE

Regent Law’s moot court team of Jessica Rigsbee ’17 and Chelsea Harkins ’17 finished second-place overall at the Robert R. Merhige, Jr. National Environmental Negotiation Competition at the University of Richmond. The team was coached by LAW professor Eric DeGroff.

2016 J. GIBBONS MOOT COURT COMPETITION:
QUARTERFINALISTS | BEST ORALIST | 2ND-BEST ORALIST

At the J. Gibbons Moot Court Competition at Seton Hall Law in Newark, New Jersey, Regent’s moot court team achieved the title of “quarterfinalists.” Kathleen Knudsen ’16, Renee Knudsen ’16, and Andrew Butler ’16 were coached by LAW professor James Duane. R. Knudsen earned the title of “best oralist”; Butler took home the “second-best oralist” honor.

2016 ANDREWS KURTH MOOT COURT NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP:
2ND PLACE | BEST BRIEF

Each January, the top 16 Moot Court programs in the United States are invited to participate in the annual Andrews Kurth Moot Court National Championship at the University of Houston. Regent was selected to participate after being ranked 8th in the nation by the University of Houston Law Center at the conclusion of the 2015 competition season. During the competition January 28-29, students Renee Knudsen, Palmer Horst, and Marie Dienhart defended their way to second-place in the nation, just behind Georgetown as they competed with teams from schools such as Southern Methodist University, New York University and Texas Tech University. The Regent team also took home the award for best brief.

2016 PRICE MEDIA LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION:
AMERICAS REGIONAL CHAMPIONS | BEST BRIEF

The Regent Law Team of Christy Hurst, Palmer Hurst and Sandra Alcaide won first place at Regional Rounds in the Americas of the Price Media Law Moot Court Competition in New York City. The team won the best brief, and Alcaide earned the marks for best oral advocate. This is the second year in a row that a team from Regent has swept the competition. They will advance to the international championship rounds of the competition at Oxford University March 30-April 2nd, the same competition where Regent’s team placed second in the world in 2013.

REGENT LAW RANKED IN THE TOP 10 FOR BEST MOOT COURT PROGRAM 2015

Regent University’s School of Law was ranked in the top 10 for Best Moot Court Program in the Andrews Kurth Moot Court National Championship rankings by the University of Houston Law Center. Regent was ranked 8th among 202 American Bar Association (ABA) accredited law schools in the United States, placing above schools such as Harvard School of Law, Yale School of Law and New York University School of Law.

2015 GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY NATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM MOOT COURT COMPETITION:
2ND PLACE | SEMI-FINALIST | BEST ORALIST

Regent University School of Law teams are continuing their victorious arguing streaks at various competitions in the United States. Earlier in February, two Regent Law Moot Court teams competed at the George Washington School of Law Religious Freedom Moot Court competition. Out of the 28 teams competing, both of Regent’s School of Law teams continued to the semi-final rounds. Paul Shakeshaft ’15 was awarded the title of Best Oralist throughout the competition.

2015 PRICE MEDIA INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT PROGRAMME:
AMERICAS REGION CHAMPIONS | INTERNATIONAL BEST BRIEF |  REGIONAL BEST BRIEF | REGIONAL BEST ORALIST

On Saturday, Feb. 1, 2015, third-year Regent Law student Jessica Krentz ’15, along with her teammates Lindsey Brower ’15 and Carly Havens ’15 took home first prize in the regional round of the Price International Moot Court Competition Americas Regional in New York City.

2015 TOURO LAW CENTER NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION IN LAW & RELIGION:
1ST PLACE

2014 BILLINGS, EXUM & FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION:
SEMI-FINALIST | BEST BRIEF

On March 28-29, 2014, Regent students competed in the fourth annual Billings, Exum & Frye National Moot Court Competition at Elon University. The team, consisting of Regent law students Tiffany Bennett, Chelsea Schlittenhart and Jaclyn Walliser, advanced in the rounds from 25 participating teams and into the semifinal round. During the competition, Bennett, Schlittenhart and Walliser also won the Best Brief Award for Petitions’ Brief. The team lost by one point during the semifinal rounds to the winning team from Southwestern Law School.

2014 GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM MOOT COURT COMPETITION:
2ND PLACE | BEST ORALIST

While exhibiting excellence in the classroom throughout their three years of law school is important to the legal profession, another vital component of training to become a lawyer is writing, researching and defending an argument. Saturday, Feb. 8, 2014, Regent Law assistant professor Tessa Dysart led her team of 3L students, Drew Cziok, Chelsea Schlittenhart and Andrew Stevener through the 2014 National Religious Freedom Moot Court Competition. The team finished in second place overall in the competition hosted by George Washington University, in Washington, D.C.

2014 TOURO LAW CENTER NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION IN LAW & RELIGION:
2ND PLACE | BEST ORALIST

2013 UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD MEDIA LAW COMPETITION: 2ND PLACE

2012 ABA ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION COMPETITION: REGIONAL CHAMPIONS

2012 NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (NMCC): REGIONAL CHAMPIONS

2012 NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION: TOP 8 | SECOND BEST BRIEF

2012 ABA NATIONAL NEGOTIATION COMPETITION: 2ND PLACE | 5TH PLACE

2011 BILLINGS, EXUM, AND FRYE NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION:  2ND PLACE | BEST BRIEF HONORS

2011 WILLIAM B. SPONG, JR. MOOT COURT INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENT: BEST ORALIST

2011 WILLIAM B. SPONG, JR. MOOT COURT INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENT: 3RD PLACE PLACE HONORS

2010 NBLSA INTERNATIONAL NEGOTIATION COMPETITION CHAMPIONS

2010 TEXAS YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION REGIONAL CHAMPIONS

2009 NATIONAL PRETRIAL COMPETITION CHAMPIONS

2009 WILLIAM B. SPONG, JR. MOOT COURT INVITATIONAL TOURNAMENT CHAMPIONS

2009  MERHIGE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL NEGOTIATION COMPETITION

2008 ABA NATIONAL APPELLATE ADVOCACY COMPETITION: REGIONAL CHAMPIONS

2007 ABA NATIONAL NEGOTIATION CHAMPIONSHIP

2006 ABA NATIONAL APPELLATE ADVOCACY COMPETITION

ABA National Appellate Advocacy Competition

  • 2016 2nd Best Oralist | 10th Best Regional Oralist | 3rd Best Regional Brief
  • 2015 Regional Champions | National Octo-Finalist | 5th Best National Brief | 3rd Best Regional Brief
  • 2014 Regional Semifinalists
  • 2013 Regional Finalists | Semifinalist | 2nd Best Oralist | 4th & 5th Best Brief
  • 2012 Best Oralist
  • 2011 Regional Finalists | Semifinalists | 5th & 8th Best Oralist
  • 2009 Regional Finalists
  • 2008 National Quarter Finalist | Regional Champions (two teams advanced to National Championship rounds) | Best Brief | 2nd Best Brief | 3rd Best Oralist
  • 2007 Finalists | Best Oralist | 5th Best Brief
  • 2006 National Champions | Best Brief | 5th Best Brief | National Quarter Finalist | Regional Champions (2 teams advanced to National Championship rounds) | 6th & 8th Best Oralists | 3rd & 4th Best Briefs | Charleston Region | 2nd, 3rd, & 7th Best Oralist, Charleston Region
  • 2005 Regional Semifinalists
  • 2004 Regional Champions | 4th & 9th Best Oralist
  • 2003 Regional Semifinalists (2 teams)
  • 2002 Regional Champions | National Semifinalists | Best Brief (Nationals) | 5th Best Oralist (Nationals) | 3rd & 4th Best Oralists | 2nd Best Brief | Southeast Region
  • 2001 Regional Finalists (2 teams) | Best Brief
  • 2000 Regional Champions | 2nd & 6th Best Oralists | Regional Finalist | Best Brief
  • 1999 Regional Champions | Best Oralist | 2nd Best Oralist
  • 1998 Regional Finalist
  • 1997 Regional Champions
  • 1996 Regional Champions

Charleston Moot Court Competition

  • 2016 1st Place and Best Oralist

New York Bar Association National Moot Court Competition

  • 2014–15 Regional Quarterfinalist | Second Best Regional Brief
  • 2013–14 National Octofinalists | Regional Finalists | Best Regional Brief
  • 2012–13 Regional Champions | Best Regional Brief | 2nd Best National Brief
  • 2011–12 National Quarter Finalists | 2nd Best National Brief | Regional Finalists | 2nd Best Regional Brief

Price Media Law Moot Court Programme

  • 2016 Americas Regional Champions | Best Brief and Best Oral Advocate
  • 2015 International Quarterfinalist | International Best Brief | International 2nd & 10th Best Oralists | Americas Region Champions | Regional Best Brief | Regional Final Round Best Oralist
  • 2013 International 2nd Place Team |  Americas Region 2nd Place Team

George Washington University Religious Freedom Moot Court Competition

  • 2015 2nd Place | Semifinalist (two teams) | Best Oralist
  • 2014 2nd Place | Best Oralist

Touro Law Center National Moot Court Competition in Law & Religion

  • 2016 Finalist | Best Oralist
  • 2015 Champions
  • 2014 Second Place Team | 1st & 2nd Best Oralists | 2nd Best Brief

Cardozo/BMI Moot Court Competition

  • 2005 Semifinalists

Federal Bar Association Thurgood Marshall Memorial Moot Court Competition

  • 2006 3rd Runner-Up | 3rd Best Oralist
  • 2003 Champions | 3rd Best Brief
  • 2002 4th Place
  • 2001 3rd Place | Best Brief
  • 1999 2nd Place | Best Brief

J. Braxton Craven Moot Court Competition

  • 2012 Quarterfinalists | Best Oralist
  • 2007 Champions

Burton D. Wechsler First Amendment Moot Court Competition

  • 2013 Semifinalists | Best Oralist
  • 2007 Champions | 3rd Best Oralist | 5th Best Brief
  • 1994 Finalist

Frederick Douglass Moot Court Competition

  • 2006 Best | 2nd Best Oralist
  • 2005 3rd Place

John J. Gibbons Criminal Procedure Moot Court Competition

  • 2016 Quarterfinalists | Best Oralist and 2nd-Best Oralist
  • 2006 2nd Place | Best & 2nd Best Oralists
  • 2005 2nd Best Oralist

Andrews Kurth Moot Court National Championship, University of Houston Law Center

  • 2016 2nd Place and Best Brief
  • 2009 Best Oralist | Second Place

William B. Spong, Jr. Memorial Moot Court

  • 2015 Semifinalists
  • 2014 Quarterfinalists
  • 2012 Quarterfinalists | 5th Place
  • 2011 3rd Place | Best Oralist
  • 2009 Champions
  • 2008 Champions | Best Brief
  • 2003 Champions
  • 2002 Quarterfinalists | 3rd & 4th Best Oralists
  • 2001 Semifinalists (2 teams)
  • 1999 Semifinalists
  • 1997 Semifinalists
  • 1996 Finalists | Best Brief

National Juvenile Law Moot Court Competition

  • 1997 Champions | Best Oralist | 2nd Best Oralist

Sutherland Cup Moot Court Competition

  • 1996 Champions | Best Oralist

Billings, Exum, and Frye National Moot Court Competition

  • 2016 Quarterfinalists | Best Petitioner Brief | Best Respondent Brief
  • 2015 Semifinalists | Best Oralist | Best Petitioner Brief
  • 2014 Semifinalists | Best Brief
  • 2013 Quarterfinalists | 2nd Best Respondent Brief
  • 2012 Quarterfinalists | Best Oralist
  • 2011 2nd Place | Quarterfinalists | Best Brief

Regent University National Constitutional Law Moot Court Competition

  • 2002 3rd Place | Best Oralist

Philip C. Jessup International Moot Court Competition, East Region

  • 1999 Runner-Up | Best Oralist | 5th Best Brief

National Entertainment & Communications Law Competition

  • 1999 Runner-Up | Best Oralist | 5th Best Brief
ABA Negotiation Competition

  • 2012 National Finalists | 2nd & 5th Place
  • 2012 Regional Champions
  • 2011 Regional Finalists | Top Four (2 Teams)
  • 2010 National Semifinalist
  • 2010 Regional Finalist
  • 2009 National 7th Place | Regional 2nd Place
  • 2007 National Champions
  • 2006 Regional 2nd Place
  • 2004 Regional 2nd Place
  • 2003 Regional 2nd Place
  • 2002 Regional Champions
  • 2001 Regional Champions
  • 2000 Regional 2nd Place
  • 1999 National Finalists
  • 1999 Regional Champions
  • 1997 Regional Champions
  • 1996 Regional Champions
  • 1995 National Champions
  • 1995 Regional Champions
  • 1994 Regional Champions
  • 1993 Regional Champions

Liberty University Government Contracts Negotiation Competition

  • 2010 Semifinalists

Robert R. Merhige, Sr., National Environmental Law Negotiation Competition

  • 2016 2nd Place
  • 2010 National Finalists
  • 2009 National Champions
  • 2008 National Finalists
  • 2006 National Finalists
  • 2005 National Finalists
  • 2004 National Finalists
  • 2001 National Finalists
  • 2000 National Champions
  • 1999 National Champions
  • 1994 National Champions
  • 1993 National Finalists

NBLSA International Negotiation Competition

  • 2010 National Champions
  • 2008 National Champions

ABA Client Counseling Competition

  • 2008 Regional Semifinalists
  • 2003 Regional Semifinalists
  • 2000 Regional Champions

ABA Representation in Mediation Competition

  • 2010 Regional 2nd & 3rd Place
  • 2009 Regional 2nd Place
  • 2008 Regional 2nd Place
  • 2003 Regional Champions

VA Mediation Network Mediation Competition

  • 2009 2nd Place

National Trial Competition

  • 2001 Regional Semifinalists
  • 2000 Regional Finalists

Stetson National Pre-trial Advocacy Competition

  • 2010 2nd Best Brief
  • 2009 Champions | Best Brief | Best Oralist
  • 2008 Best Brief

Capitol City Challenge Trial Competition

  • 2010 Semifinalists

Texas Young Lawyers Association National Trial Competition

  • 2015 Regional Semifinalists
  • 2011 Regional Quarterfinalists
  • 2010 Regional Champions
  • 2000 Regional Semifinalists

ABA Labor and Employment Law Competition

  • 2010 Semifinalists
  • 2005 Champions